A reflection on Hunt’s “Leadership: A new synthesis” (1996)
- Image via Wikipedia
remember that Hunt is writing his synthesis in 1996, and he comes from the leadership discipline, not education or cognitive neuroscience. He is good when it comes to synthesizing existing literature, but his excursions into the future of “what-if” are not very convincing.
There has been a lot of important work done on the very issues of rationality vs intuition, on (control & prediction) vs (emergence & adaptation), but it hasnt come from the land of leadership.
I have been doing a ton of research in this area, and in fact the limitations of rationality, and the implications for leaders, leadership skills, organizations and culture, strategic planning and operational execution are precisely the reason i started this program.
my mission is to figure out what leaders need to know, be, and do to manage problems & opportunities outside of the bounds of rationality and convention, and then design and deliver a teachable curriculum that prepares students and faculty for fuzzy situations and coalitions. where goals, cultures, standards, criteria, resources, time horizons are much closer to chaos than order, and with no interest among the stakeholders to move away from the apparent chaos.
I take Heifetz as representative of the state of leadership which has apparently spent the last 2 decades trying to micro-refine the individual models of leadership, and which in my opinion have been left behind by the nature of the challenges for organizations. Even seen as a consultants handbook, Heifetz is comfortably situated inside conventional, stable organizations trying to tweak their way to success.
Back to your point.
The rationality vs intuition debate is best developed from the world of decision-making and cognition. The essential and representative authors to read are Gerd Gigerenzer & Gary Klein, on intuition and heuristic decisionmaking. William Poundstone’s “Labyrinths of Reason” is an excellent introduction to the limitations of rationality. James March on decision-making systems is foundational. Mintzberg is pretty good on recognizing the implications Tversky & Kahneman’s Nobel prize winning work on cognitive biases and behavioral finance is the top level theory basis (spanning 40 years), and all of these guys connect back to the incomparable Herb Simon’s bounded rationality from the 1940s, and which still is some of the best writing and thinking in this area.
The most promising area of current research is found in the fields of emergence, chaos and complexity theory (including complex adaptive systems) but there are miles to go to connect these ideas to the leadership disciplines
So, i think Hunt was intuiting that something else was needed, but hadn’t connected to that body of work.
There is another whole discipline that’s waiting to be incorporated: education, especially adult education, and that’s where i seem to be centered: in the preparation of leaders for these new demands/considerations, while satisfying the constraints of an accreditation system which values certainty, objectivity and standardization.
it seems to me that education lags about 20-25 years behind the cutting edge, as accreditation’s fascination with certainty, objectivity and standardization reflects what was thought to be essential in business and commerce 2 decades ago. So education is just discovering that which the rest of the world is abandoning (or at least moving well beyond)
Related articles by Zemanta
- Osborne: arrogant prat (stumblingandmumbling.typepad.com)
- Diary of a Private Investor: bounded rationality damages our investment performance. (telegraph.co.uk)
- The riddle of experience vs. memory: Daniel Kahneman on TED.com (ted.com)
- Neurovid: Experience vs. Memory (trueslant.com)
- Daniel Kahneman: The riddle of experience vs. memory (3quarksdaily.com)
- The Power of Memory on Happiness (on-purpose.blogspot.com)
-
March 24, 2010 at 9:15 pmApple, design thinking, nationbuilding « kansas reflections
-
March 24, 2010 at 9:22 pmReflecting on Heifetz and Hunt on leadership « kansas reflections
-
March 24, 2010 at 9:32 pmA note to John Edwards: choke yourself « kansas reflections
-
March 24, 2010 at 9:39 pmleadership in complexity: making the game simple « kansas reflections
-
March 24, 2010 at 9:42 pmleadership in complex adaptive systems « kansas reflections
-
March 24, 2010 at 9:43 pmLeadership and charisma: what’s the relationship? « kansas reflections
-
March 24, 2010 at 10:11 pmThe age of external knowledge: why know anything except how to search « kansas reflections
-
March 24, 2010 at 10:44 pmHaiti and the little red hen « kansas reflections
-
March 25, 2010 at 8:41 pmTrader’s roundtable: correllation between ETFs « kansas reflections
-
April 11, 2010 at 10:33 amInformation technology: integrating IT into Strategic planning « kansas reflections
-
April 22, 2010 at 11:54 amLearning from the process consultant « kansas reflections
-
April 22, 2010 at 12:00 pmHow important is contextual knowledge for process consultants in business settings? « kansas reflections
-
April 22, 2010 at 12:13 pmPlanning considerations for “insider” consultants « kansas reflections
-
April 22, 2010 at 3:06 pmComplexity in process consulting: a good thing? « kansas reflections
-
May 17, 2010 at 9:21 pmappreciative intelligence improves youth soccer coaching « kansas reflections
-
May 25, 2010 at 1:00 amDeveloping disciplining young athletes « kansas reflections
-
May 29, 2010 at 2:18 pmTransparency in your personal life: an act of courage « kansas reflections