Home > education > The Many Distinctions of Narrative Inquiry

The Many Distinctions of Narrative Inquiry

While conducting a methodological review of narrative inquiry as a technique to create meaning from heaps of data, both qualitative and quantitative it quickly became apparent that narrative inquiry is a much broader and deeper and diversified field than I originally thought. It is such a rich area that it deserves some detail research in order for me to find the appropriate method to apply to my particular research situation. A cursory review of the literature discovers at least 20 different techniques with various distinctions that are available to the qualitative researcher.

Here is a partial listing of just some of the different strategies and perspectives that a narrative inquiry can offer the qualitative researcher:

*   recording the experience of living the story as it occurs
*   interviewing the storyteller to compare their story with factual data
*   Language experts who analyze the forms and modes of the storytelling independent of content
*   Constructivists looking for methods of sense making and storytelling
*   deconstructionists looking to uncover the textual meaning
*   cultural storytellers looking to integrate storytelling in the larger culture
*   organizational developers comparing the nature of culture to the nature and power of storytelling
*   dramatists interested in the performance aspects and knowledge creation aspects of the act of storytelling itself
*   ethnographers looking to create a rich description of the storytelling environment
*   the Boje school of antenarrative which questions the validity of storytelling and grand narrative as a truth-hiding process
*   pragmatists looking to assess the effect of a change in storytelling style on various dimensions of performance
*   mixed methodists looking to use narrative to infer meaning from quantitative data
*   Post positivists looking to validate storytelling through confirmation by quantitative data

Categories: education Tags: ,
  1. August 2, 2009 at 11:32 pm

    Interesting, maybe that is why most qualitative research is related to some other form of quantitative research. (Or is this another chicken and egg scenario?) I must admit, I have never met anyone who has done a narrative inquiry before, but after reading your “short” article, I can understand why. Most of the qualitative research papers I’ve seen have very specific choices of answers. Anomalies are all lump together as “Others” or “None of the above” etc.

  1. No trackbacks yet.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: