I applaud the idea, but it doesn’t go far enough. How about Congressmen get a pay cut proportional to the size of the deficit budgets they pass? So, this year they should receive a 40% pay cut
Congratulations to President Obama for passing a bill to spend more money and raise more taxes. That’s the leadership you voted for
It’s sad to see my home town descend into such disgrace. It wouldn’t be this bad if Republicans were in charge and were really as evil as Democrats are incompetent. Unemployed and not looking 47% 35% on foodstamps; 1000s of homes abandoned’. Population cut in half in 20 yrs
“Leaders” crying out for more dole
Meanwhile Democrat poster boy Warren Buffett is engaging in the completely legal tax avoidance behavior that is getting Google pilloried fpr prudent fisuciarily responble decisions about what to do with their money.
dare people act in such a way as to deny government every possible dollar? the nerve!
Obama’s re-election has been profitable for us in the trading room. Unfortunately, the market is suffering just like the nation, from the election. But you get the government you deserve. The market is taking into account that he has no record of actually being able to accomplish anything except fooling most of the people part of the time, long enough to get re-elected. Expecting him to be unable to do anything about the fiscal cliff, the repositioning overseas and into Treasuries has begun. The best we have to look forward to is listening to 4 years of what his legacy will be, and listening to that smug hack Biden position himself for 2016
Imagine if this had been a Republican political candidate. What would the list of follow-up questions have included?
- Why do you classify this as an error?
- Was it an error of omission or commission?
- What is the purpose of editing?
- Why wasn’t it posted that this was an edited call, in the same way that text edits are annotated when materieal is ommitted?
- How do you decide if the edit is faithful to the larger original context?
- How does this compare to your standards?
- Is this typical of your editing process? How do you know?
- Who monitors you?
- NBC issues apology on George Zimmerman tape screw-up (nextlevelofnews.com)
- Sarah Palin on NBC’s Today Show: “…When Barack Obama Took Over” (markamerica.com)
- Sarah Palin to co-host NBC’s ‘Today’ on Tuesday (boston.com)
- NBC News Admits ‘Error’ In Editing George Zimmerman’s 911 Call, Apologizes (mediaite.com)
- NBC: Romney will win primaries in Maryland and DC (donny-wise.com)
- First Thoughts: Romney to wrap it up? (firstread.msnbc.msn.com)
- Sarah Palin to co-host NBC’s ‘Today’ on Tuesday (newsok.com)
- Sarah Palin to co-host NBC’s ‘Today’ on Tuesday (hosted.ap.org)
- NBC Uses GOP Hostility to Women to Plead with Hillary Clinton to Run for President: ‘Why Not?’ (newsbusters.org)
- Bernie Goldberg To O’Reilly: NBC Should ‘Cut Their Relationship’ With ‘Irresponsible’ MSNBC (mediaite.com)
- Congressional negotiators reach tentative deal on payroll tax cut, jobless aid … – Fox News (foxnews.com)
- Economic Growth Gives Lift to Obama in NYT/CBS Poll – New York Times (nytimes.com)
- Obama stresses economic roles with China’s expected new leader – CNN International (edition.cnn.com)
- White House unveils tougher Iran oil curbs – Financial Times (ft.com)
- Divided Opposition: Key to Syrian Power – TIME (time.com)
- U.S. brigadier general dies in Afghanistan (cnn.com)
- Top U.S. officer dies in Afghanistan (edition.cnn.com)
- CGSC Foundation Receives $6.1 Million Pledge From H. Ross Perot (prweb.com)
- Investigation after Brigadier General Terence Hildner becomes highest-ranking officer to die in Afghanistan so far (dailymail.co.uk)
- CGSC Foundation’s ‘Col. Arthur D. Simons Center’ Opens at Fort Leavenworth (prweb.com)
- CGSC Foundation Continues Partnership with Flint Hills Resources (prweb.com)
- CGSC Foundation Presents Ross Perot with 2010 Distinguished Leadership Award (prweb.com)
- Military base closings are possible in central Pennsylvania (pennlive.com)
- Military’s Lock-Step Promotion System (outsidethebeltway.com)
- Central Pennsylvania could be gearing up to fight rounds of military closures (pennlive.com)
I see liberal commentators like Cenk Uygur applauding the reduction of 280B from the proposed budget, as an end to corporate crony capitalism. As if that’s not going to have an effect on the price of food, which is a disproportionally higher percentage of the budgets for the poor than the rich.
Cut 280B from subsidies, and prices will rise about….280B. That works out to about 3K per person per year in the US. Families currently on the margin will then need assistance to make ends meet. The cost of assistance will be passed on to the middle class, who always pays
The response will naturally be to increase the funding for food stamps, and more firmly connect the people to an all powerful natioanl government that provides for all necessities. Who could trust local and state governments, or betterm families and churches to take care of their tribes. What an odd notion these days
- Budget cutting by reducing farm subsidies (kansasreflections.wordpress.com)
- Cenk Uygur Cuts Peter Schiff’s Mic During Heated Discussion Over Crony Capitalism (mediaite.com)
- Twitter Attack Ad Against Cenk Uygur (faktensucher.wordpress.com)
- Libertarian students use Valentine’s Day to expose unhealthy lovefest between big business and political institutions (summitcountyvoice.com)
- Please “Current Tv” Take Cenk Uygur, the Stupid Turk Lawyer Off the Aire (bonjupatten.com)
- Subsidies always discriminate (tigerhawk.blogspot.com)
- Marcus Samuelsson: How Food Politics Can Affect Your Election Choices (huffingtonpost.com)
- The Good News and Bad News about Energy in President Obama’s Budget (insightadvisor.wordpress.com)
- Senators kick aganist fuel subsidy removal (vanguardngr.com)
- Are Farm Subsidies Really to Blame for Obesity? (alternet.org)
- Barack Obama Unveils A $3.8 TRILLION Budget! (perezhilton.com)
- Obama’s Budget, Explained in a Chart (businessweek.com)
- Open Thread: Foodstamp Nation? (newsbusters.org)
- “Budget Honesty” (duanegraham.wordpress.com)
- Welfare for the rich: Springsteen, Bon Jovi and Ted Turner get over $30billion in tax subsidies every year (talesfromthelou.wordpress.com)
- A look at Greece’s austerity measures (sfgate.com)
That there are 36 Obama aides who owe back taxes is great news for the country which had just learned at the State of the Union speech that Tim “Tax Cheat” Geithner wouldn’t be around for a second term as Treasury Secretary.
We now have an expanded pool of candidates to take over from Geithner, possessing his same qualities and practices.
- Jan Brewer and Barack Obama in Heated Exchange on Runway [Video] (inquisitr.com)
- Obama’s State of the Union: More Bailouts and Spending (truthsupport.wordpress.com)
- Impeach Obama (mrdaler.wordpress.com)
- Obama Calls for Unity During State of the Union Address (beenetworknews.com)
- Obama: No Retreat, No Surrender (themoderatevoice.com)
- Mitt Romney Calls Obama Administration a ‘Groundhog Day Presidency’ (abcnews.go.com)
- This Is Obama’s 2012 State of the Future (gizmodo.com)
- OBAMA HULK SMASH GOP [Desired] (gizmodo.com)
Making the Invisible Visible: Understanding Leadership Contributions of Asian Minorities in the Workplace
This small quiet book on leadership deserves to become visible so that its message of quiet leadership can be absorbed into our business and political organizations worldwide.
Back up for a moment: SHOULD we MAKE them visible, or is our understanding of leadership in the Western mode, with the “Individual as Hero”, not all there is to the story?
The authors tackle the problems and opportunities of global leadership from an angle that would be seen as nontraditional by Western leaders but which addresses the reality of leadership in daily life as experienced by millions of people around the world.
Coming from a Western in military background, I’ve grown up in a leadership culture that prizes individual heroic approaches to direct action leadership. I’ve never felt like that reflected everything that needs to be said about leadership and that’s the central message of this powerful book.
Thatchenkery and Sugiyama conducted a multi-year study to examine what they call the invisible leadership style that they experienced as members of various Asian communities. What they call invisible leadership can be thought of as a cultural worldview built on the ideas that showmanship is the opposite of leadership, that what matters is teamwork and results in long time horizons that favor growth and development from the inside of the organization and that performance is examined and valued on the basis of what’s good for the team. Invisible leaders get the job done and trust that the results will speak for themselves. They value team performance, and dont expect leaders to be constantly self-promoting and trumpeting from the front.
The authors proceed to explore their sense of this phenomenon by conducting a thoroughly grounded research effort that incorporates quantitative and qualitative data and analysis using surveys, focus groups, interviews and case studies to develop their argument. It is a model of scholarly work that carefully identifies assumptions, limitations and constraints while pointing to areas of consensus and opportunities to apply their insights in the last chapter.
They’ve incorporated scholarship on the impact of culture, motivation theory, multiple models of leadership and globalization in their efforts. They examine the impacts of leadership style and philosophy on promotions, training, recognition and reward systems and considered how invisible leadership is affected by current management practices in developing metrics, management practices and counseling programs.
They carefully examined the very notion of the utility of categorizing leadership under the broad concept of “Asian”, which on the surface seems like it could be useful but which masks the very real richness and diversity that can be found in various communities of practice and social groups populated by people from India, China, Japan, Thailand, Korea etc who are living and working in the United States, United Kingdom and Canada and whose generational demographics and further complexity to the rich mélange that is their personal experience.
The study takes a cross-section of all of these personal demographic factors and adds a further dimension based on work factors like public versus private versus nonprofit institutions. No simple leadership model can do justice to such a complex sociological mixture, despite the loud proclamations of best-selling leadership book titles, and the promises of quick fix, simple formula leadership solutions. The authors findings resonate with Heifetz’s “Leadership Without Easy Answers “, and Deming’s advice to “eliminate slogans”.
The book begins what should be a long and continuing conversation to understand the real-life complexities of modern organizations and to find ways to unleash the power and quality of all our people. It suggests that organizations can begin to apply the insights of invisible leadership by asking the right questions, considering organizational policies about visible leadership, and the payoffs of supporting invisible leaders from both pragmatic and philosophical perspectives.
They carefully examine and debunk three common mental models that have plagued Asians in the United States, the UK and Canada. Asians have been variously seen as a model minority that has supposedly “made it” and shown the way for other ethnicities; as a “middle minority” without the social problems inherent in newly emerging groups but who are not quite yet co-equal with the majority and the experience of Asians as a group that is forever foreign. According to the study, these mental models are broadly perceived by Asians to affect them personally and professionally and get in the way of Asians being seen as individuals with rich personal narratives and unique circumstances.
The study examines the realities of glass ceilings in professional promotion patterns in a broad spectrum of typical organizations, relying on insights from personal interviews and government statistics to make the case. It avoids simplistic formulations and superficial conclusions and does a fantastic job of providing a rich background of context that suggests many avenues of research needed in the future.
The authors suggest that organizing around affinity groups rather than simple ethnic and social groupings can add real value to organizational dynamics. Considering the impacts of quiet leadership at all levels of the organization: strategic, operational and tactical can have powerful implications for policy and vision. They recommend organizations consider breaking with tradition of hiring outside leaders and rather concentrate more on growing their own from the inside as a way to acknowledge the power of tacit, long-term values based growth.
The authors don’t recommend a simple exchange of philosophies (“either-or”) but rather suggest that broader integration of multiple modes and perspectives on leadership will add value and robustness to organizational DNA.
I give this fine book my highest personal and professional recommendation, because it resonates for me on a personal and a professional level. It describes a style and philosophy of leadership that has gotten little to no attention in the scholarly or popular press and which I have witnessed to be enduringly effective. It treats a serious subject seriously and respects the broad diversity of opinion and scholarship that has been conducted in this area and yet finds many points of contention and new sources of information and inspiration. It’s offered in the spirit of scholarship and understanding and suggests new ways in which our global communities and people can be respected and make progress together.
- Implicit Leadership Theories (colleensharen.wordpress.com)
- Leadership Is Not… (bmc24me.wordpress.com)
- Leadership Skills (contemporarymanagement.wordpress.com)
- Good Leadership Habits Start Early (sbkandassociates.com)
- Confusing Leadership and Role Models (colleensharen.wordpress.com)
- Leadership – Lost and Found (bigthink.com)
- 360 Degrees of Influence: Get Everyone to Follow Your Lead on Your Way to the Top (pro2sell.com)
- M.I.A. Leadership (passionate-performance.com)
- Is Your Leadership Limiting Your Organizations Ability to Grow? (customerthink.com)
- Jeffrey Pfeffer ~ Leadership: Does it make a difference? (greeneyezwinkin5.wordpress.com)
it would’ve been a sad day for the Republic if Stephen Colbert’s latest idiotic attempt at cynical satire had further disrupted national politics in South Carolina. it is reassuring that so few people actually took him up on his promise of adding even more chaos to the Republican primary process.
Colbert is becoming just a little too impressed with himself and his pseudo-influence. The incident further proves that Herman Cain is incapable of feeling shame about his judgment really is as poor as it seems. Between the two of them, they have set back the Republicans progress by a decade.
On the other hand, typical Republican voters don’t know who Stephen Colbert is, and they have already begun to forget the disaster that is Herman Cain. Cain has succeeded in making Obama look presidential.
- Raising Cain in South Carolina (538refugees.wordpress.com)
- A Vote For Cain Is A Vote For Colbert (eoghann.com)
- Media Roundup for “Rock Me Like A Herman Cain: South Cain-olina Primary Rally” (colbertnewshub.com)
- Stephen Colbert Holds A Rally For Herman Cain Despite His Dropping Out Of Presidential Race (perezhilton.com)
- Stephen Colbert Asks South Carolina to “Rock Me Like a Herman Cain”! (colbertnewshub.com)
- S. Carolina Final: Raising Cain (bagnewsnotes.com)
- Stephen Colbert and James Taylor Sing Carolina in My Mind (shoppingblog.com)
- Stephen Colbert’s Super PAC: Vote for ‘Herman Cain’ (newsfeed.time.com)
- Stephen Colbert Exploring Run in South Carolina (newsy.com)
- Stephen Colbert is right on the money (thehill.com)
- Stephen Colbert for president? (canada.com)
- Comedian Stephen Colbert Could Make White House Bid (usnews.com)
- Stephen Colbert Transfers Super PAC Power To Jon Stewart As He Considers Presidential Run (newsroom.mtv.com)
Since Romney seems unable to tell the simple truth about Gingrish’s unfitness for executive leadership, it’s up to Santorum
, who is unelectable, to do the dirty work. There is a cabinet position for santorum in the Romney administration, hey, maybe even the VP position, if he carries the water for Mr Bland
- I Support Newt Gingrich (crazyjew.wordpress.com)
- A Sharp Exchange Between Santorum and Romney (thecaucus.blogs.nytimes.com)
- Iowa Revisited: Santorum Wins! (markamerica.com)
- Santorum video warns Florida voters not to walk off cliff with Romney (tampabay.com)
- Religious right unifies behind Santorum to beat Romney (americablog.com)