commentary on managing change

 

Motivation

Creating a vision

Managing politics

Manage transition

Sustain momentum

Can you crosswalk those five major activities to and AI approach?

How can AI positively affect each of those?

What can we do to reinforce new behaviors at the managerial level?

Once the speeches are over and the awards have been presented we all go back to our desk to start working, what changed is a result of our intervention?

How do we institutionalize the positive change?

Related articles

• Abstract Paper – Organizational Change On Managerial Roles In Petroleum Development Of Oman (PDO) (thinkingbookworm.typepad.com)
• Unified: Unity Of Command Patch/Sale/Demo (rockpapershotgun.com)

Australia and Canada for the long haul

American investor Jim Rogers in Madrid (Spain) during an interview. Español: El inversor norteamericano Jim Rogers en Madrid (España) durante una entrevista. (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

Jim Rogers : The faster numbers will be in economies that are well managed and that have commodities because commodities are in a bull market. Indonesia is doing much better this decade than it did in the 1990s because there was a commodity bear market in those days. Australia is going to do better than Belgium. Canada is going to do better than the United States. So you look for well managed countries which have a lot of commodities and you will probably make a huge amount of money. I am not putting money on Congo which has a lot of commodities because this is not well managed. I would look at well-managed commodities countries.- in Economic Times

Related articles

• Print Money, Spend It, Get Re-Elected (lewrockwell.com)
• Jim Rogers: Invest in Countries with Well-Managed Commodities (wealthwire.com)
• Plunging Commodity Prices Are Ominous For Stock Market! (businessinsider.com)
• Commodities | Lloyds Bank (lloydsbankwholesale.com)
• Janet Tavakoli on Jamie Dimon’s Crazy Trade in Coal (economicpolicyjournal.com)
• How to Trade Commodities (answers.com)
• Janet Tavakoli: Jamie Dimon’s SNAFU: JPMorgan’s Other Derivatives’ Losses (huffingtonpost.com)
• Commodity Dealing and Brokerage in the US Industry Market Research Report Now Available from IBISWorld (prweb.com)

the president hides behind his daughters on the issue of gay marriage

the president’s re-election committee’s daily emails says that he supoprts gay marriage because his daughters wouldnt be able to understand why the same sex parents of their friends shouldnt be treated equally.

because its a good idea to make your own moral judgments based on the sensibilities of children, rather than making an adult level decision on your own

How is this sound judgment?

Warren Buffett poster revised (Photo credit: MarkGregory007)

Munger said that unlike Buffett, who announced he is fighting early-stageprostate cancer, he doesn’t even bother to get his PSA levels checked.

One of the few times I ever thought Munger was a dumbass

Santorum, the American Achmehdinejad, still taking himself seriously

No sense of self,  no sense of decorum.  At least 1 person still takes him seriously, and that person is holding an etch-a-sketch

Related articles

• Did you hear this one from Santorum? (underthelobsterscope.wordpress.com)
• Michael Falcone reported from Arbutus, Md., and Arlette Saenz reported from Harvey, La. (imageinme.wordpress.com)
• Everyone Loves a Good Etch A Sketch Meme (newsfeed.time.com)
• Santorum doesn’t let up on Etch A Sketch attack (politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com)
• BREAKING: Mitt Romney confirms he is Mr. Etch-A-Sketch (dailykos.com)
• Etch A Sketch Comment Paints Mitt Romney As A Flip Flopper (inquisitr.com)
• Santorum invokes Katrina in questioning whether Romney would ‘blow in the wind’ (thehill.com)
• Foes seek mileage from ‘Etch A Sketch’ (cnn.com)
• Romney aide gaffe hands rivals an unexpected bonus (worldviewtonight.com)
• Santorum Hits Romney On Adviser’s ‘Etch A Sketch’ Comment (thinkprogress.org)

Conservatives to Axelrod: please keep talking

Its a conservative’s dream for Axelrod to take this show on the road:  they hope he keeps talking

The lonely courage of the doctoral student

I continue to marvel at the willingness of the doctoral student to keep going bravely into the darkness, as each day they learn more about their field, only to discover how much more they don’t know.

Each thing you painfully discover points to a new set of 100 that you don’t know, and now realize you have even less reason to trust your conventional judgment.

And yet, they keep pushing the boulder up hill.

It’s a tribute to their indomitable spirit, this willingness to keep going, without the certainty of what may be waiting for them at the destination.

Critical thinking seminar notes

Memo for: Record,  and my personal learning journal

Subject: Review of critical thinking workshop, 21 – 22 February 2012

Author: Ken Long

Date: 24 February 2012

 

1. 1.       Administrative notes:
   1. presenter was Dr. Enoch Hale from the Foundation for Critical Thinking led by Paul and Elder, sponsored by School for Command Prep, featuring broad college attendance
   2. two-day seminar, 12 hours of instruction, focusing on short experiential learning lessons to introduce them apply strategies outlined in pollen elders and books.
   3. DLRO attendees: LTC Tossie Andrews, Mike Weaver, Tom Creviston, Gerry Leonard, Ken Long.
   4. Conclusion: this was an excellent experiential learning based workshop for CT using the Paul and Elder model that would be very beneficial for any ILE instructor. Two days of focused learning was just about right for both focus and endurance. The short experiential exercises were especially effective in keeping our attention and providing hands-on validation of effective classroom technique. Minimal use of slides, mostly discussion and small group experience
   5. 2.       Workshop Topic sequence:
      1. what is our background in critical thinking and how have we developed the skills we have?
      2. Critical thinking definition exercise
      3. critical thinking as an exercising in asking excellent probing questions
      4. how can we find the limits of our knowledge?
      5. Identify the intellectual moves you would like to see soldiers make or do. This is connected to defining educational outcomes in terms of observable behaviors and habits of mind. Examples: know the requirement, clarify the requirement, always consult three sources, ask for examples, provide illustrations, pose test cases, evaluate arguments, evaluate evidence, analyze chains of reasoning
      6. short discussion: how can we help students learn the skills needed to form clear probing questions? How can you key your questions to the learning level of the students? Reference Paul and Elder, “asking essential questions “, pages 5-6
      7. examine intellectual traits and virtues on page 13 of Paul and Elder critical thinking concepts and tools: where are your students strong or weak and why? Evidence?
      8. Fill in the blank: the teacher’s job is to_______? the student’s job is to___________?
      9. asking students: what was the most relevant part of the lesson? And then what is your biggest unanswered question? This is similar to our five questions
      10. reasoning by analogy to compare relationship between everyday thinking and critical thinking
      11. review poem and experience sense making individually, then discuss
      12. compared unfocused narrative of walking through a house with walking through the house adopting different perspectives: homebuyer, thief, parent
      13. deeper discussion of critical thinking definition (example: critical thinking is the intentional, structured, systematic, analytic and synthetic, evaluative process of reflective thinking in order to evaluate the quality of our thinking to improve our thinking). Now analyze for nouns verbs, adjectives, perspectives, assumptions, judgments.
      14. Thought experiment: why is CT important & why is it not important
      15. identifying intellectual moves: defined, elaborate, example, illustrate, analogy, simile, metaphor
      16. defining the principle/process of clarity: SEEI (state, elaborate, exemplify, illustrate)
      17. short discussion of activated ignorance versus activated knowledge versus static knowledge
      18. short exercise: how can your thinking trap you or free you?
      19. Short discussion: how do the following affect thinking and what can CT do about them: ego, socio-economic status, ethnicity, culture, religion, education?
      20. Dr. Hale: I have a list of 100 instructional strategies for CT, but I have about a dozen “go to” favorites
      21. examining the Logic and relationship of student thinking, content, instruction as three different areas but also connected in a larger meta-area.
      22. an exercise in sense making: what’s the relationship of education to:  socialization, indoctrination, training
      23. QAO exercise: questioner, answerer, observer, followed by feedback on each role
      24. discussion of Delphi group technique in the importance of a period of individual independent reflection
      25. the use and mutual understanding of precise language to describe CT concepts and processes, similar to the importance of doctrinal language
      26. make a list of the questions that are currently guiding your teaching
      27. list obstacles to critical thinking
      28. Dr. Hale presented research findings on retention levels and recommended the use of a 10/3 model of instruction: 10 min. discussion followed by 3 min. student experiential processing. This improves retention from 20% of and hours lecture to 85%. We could do about three chunks in each contact hour.
      29. Short discussion: searchlight versus laser metaphor to understand the type of thinking we’re engaged in at the moment.  Wide-area search versus deep understanding
      30. short discussion: “the critical mind is the questioning mind”
      31. action versus reflection: does your thinking lead to action or to reflection, then action?
      32. Describe an experience when you saw someone apply an intellectual trait that made a difference
      33. what intellectual practices prevent the application of Paul and Elder’s intellectual traits
      34. exercising the CT muscles routinely
      35. small group Socratic seminars
      36. timed writing exercise to take a snapshot
      37. short discussion: problem finding versus problem-solving
      38. timed writing, around the horn to collect insights into your important question

 

1. 3.       Specific exercises:  experiential learning exercises in the workshop that we may be able to use in our classroom (lots of duplication with para 2, due to experiential learning mode of the workshop)
   1. reflect on your experience of critical thinking
   2. identify examples of critical thinking from your life
   3. define critical thinking and compare to expert definition
   4. identify excellent critical thinking questions
   5. identify where your students are strong or weak in questioning
   6. fill in the blank: teachers job, students job to make their beliefs explicit
   7. reasoning by analogy:->critical thinking: thinking::________: walking….(ballet?)
   8. Review poem, conduct individual sense making, then discuss compare and contrast
   9. identify what’s important in a narrative by adopting different perspectives
   10. compare and contrast competing definitions of critical thinking.
   11. Frame an argument: why is CT important/not important
   12. identifying intellectual moves: defined, elaborate, example, illustrate, analogy, simile, metaphor
   13. defining the principle/process of clarity: SEEI (state, elaborate, exemplify, illustrate)
   14. short exercise: how can your thinking trap you or free you?
   15. Short discussion: how do the following affect thinking and what can CT do about them: ego, socio-economic status, ethnicity, culture, religion, education?
   16. QAO exercise: questioner, answerer, observer, followed by feedback on each role
   17. an exercise in sense making: what’s the relationship of education to:  socialization, indoctrination, training
   18. evaluating the skill of the observer to accurately and richly described behavioral data
   19. Delphi group technique
   20. identify the important questions guiding your teaching and learning
   21. list obstacles to critical thinking
   22. 10/3 instructional model searchlight versus laser metaphor to understand the type of thinking we’re engaged in at the moment
   23. describe an experience when it intellectual traits made a difference
   24. what intellectual practices prevent the application of Paul and Elder’s intellectual traits
   25. how can we lower the transaction costs to using CT routinely?
   26. Small group Socratic seminar
   27. dialogue: why is CT relevant to me when I’m trying to master a complex body of knowledge?
   28. Timed writing to take snapshots
   29. are we problem finding or problem-solving?
   30. timed writing, around the horn to collect insights into your important question

 

1. 4.       Personal A-Ha! Moments:
   1. the power and effectiveness of the five questions to ask students
   2. are we really a learning organization?; a critical thinking organization? How would we know? What evidence would we look for to prove it?
   3. Is the lack of critical thinking skills related to our increasingly large role as consumers of information, opinion, thinking and critical thinking from others? Have we lost the initiative on our own thinking?
   4.  QAO
   5. CT educational outcomes
   6. the questions driving your teaching
   7. 10/3 technique
   8. the importance of the Argyris “ladder of inference” and knowing where you are
   9. integrating CT into all lesson plans
   10. treating FDP2 as the most important lessons we teach rather than executive summaries to be endured
   11. professionals:

i.      know the rules

ii.      apply the rules

iii.      break the rules properly

iv.      Write good roles

v.      seek and embrace better rules

1. can we use the equivalent of Yahoo answers to rank student answers to important questions to stimulate dialogue?
2. Problem fighting versus problem-solving

 

1. 5.       CT chunks: my personal answers to experiential exercises

 

1. a.       top 10 things a major should know and be able to do:

i.      know how to estimate/analyze for requirements

ii.      identify minimum mission essential sustainment levels

iii.      identify critical sustainment tasks for an operation

iv.      evaluate options for command and support relationships and pick the best one to meet your trade-off criteria

v.      evaluate sustainment risk to a mission based on concept of support

vi.      identify infeasible solutions

vii.      know how to make a rough estimate of capabilities and requirements

viii.      know how the sustainment forces are arrayed on the battlefield

ix.      appreciate time distance factors

x.      know where I go for answers and know when those answers are good

 

1. b.      obstacles to critical thinking

i.      time

ii.      energy

iii.      relevance

iv.      desire for certainty

v.      doctrine

vi.      interest

                                                          vii.      dull, stupid, lazy people (says more about me…)

viii.      tension between creativity and critical thinking

ix.      motivation

x.      lack of priority

xi.      different expectations

xii.      lack of imagination/understanding about the larger picture in context

 

1. c.       evaluating the observers skill/performance:

i.      what behaviors did you observe?

ii.      What facial expressions?

iii.      what body language did you see?

iv.      where were the students focusing attention? Why do you say that?

v.      What social pressures do you think you saw?

vi.      Why would people feel social pressure in that situation?

vii.      Are you observing or inferring?

 

1. My personal definition of critical thinking: critical thinking is the intentional, structured, systematic, analytic and synthetic, evaluative process of reflective thinking to evaluate the quality of our thinking to improve our thinking

 

1. why CT is not important:

i.      it’s hard

ii.      it creates friction

iii.      it wastes time

iv.      it devalues what we know

v.      it’s not persuasive

vi.      it’s not relevant

vii.      it’s idealistic

 

1. f.        what I think our students are good and bad at (skills): (says more about me them them, but that’s the purpose of this exercise)

i.      good: goals and purpose, clarification, appreciating other viewpoints

ii.      bad: inference/conclusions, analyzing assumptions, comparisons

 

1. g.       what I think your students are good and bad at (traits): (says more about me them them, but that’s the purpose of this exercise)

i.      good: integrity, humility

ii.      bad: empathy, perseverance, confidence, autonomy

iii.      I don’t see them actively questioning to develop intellectual dispositions

 

1. h.      my CT history:

i.      high school science teacher who demonstrated how easy it is to fool people by lying

ii.      great book series and Mortimer Adler: how do we know?

iii.      Math, trial and error, application

iv.      a stubborn streak that questions the authority and prefers the inner voice

 

1. i.        what CT intellectual moves/techniques do I favor?

i.      Mind mapping for processes and concepts

ii.      interactive argument mapping

iii.      the use of experiential test cases/practical exercises

iv.      empathy for the underdog

v.      exploring alternate perspectives

vi.      unpacking assumptions

vii.      mapping logic chains

viii.      reflective sense making

ix.      Peter Facione & Paul and Elder

x.      don’t give advice until they have thought it through and committed their position to writing

 

1. the Write Around answers to my posed question,.: why is CT relevant to me when I’m trying to master a complex body of knowledge?  (which is what I think is in the students had all the time, because that’s what’s always inside my head whenever somebody proposes to teach me anything; says more about me…)

i.      You must show them why it’s relevant; better yet, get them through guided dialogue to make the value connection

ii.      consider using Bloom’s taxonomy to develop interest in this from a mastery perspective. What level do you need to achieve to lead soldiers?

iii.      Show how CT dissects the thinking process and thus helps to solve complex problems and enhance learning

iv.      CT is part of the intellectual combined arms fight. It has its role in priority of effort depending on the phase of operation, like foundations, but it must be integrated into the larger whole

v.      CT provides a framework to examine separate issues using the same standards. Students understand that consistency and thought leads to better, well thought out solutions. It produces CT muscle memory.

 

1. 6.       Action steps:
   1. share journal with department and my students
   2. post on my blog to invite comment and discussion
   3. staff idea of incorporating a CT section in each lesson plan to provide faculty a menu of choices to you CT in the: CE, P&P, apply, develop areas. (Passed initial feasibility sample of five faculty, independently)
   4. incorporate CT structure into A491 lessons carefully
   5. add personal learning Journal technique to A457 and MMAS students

The importance of alone time: solitude and innovation

Image via Wikipedia

A long snippet, but it has important things to say about solitude, inquiry, creating new knowledge, innovation and scholarship: the importance of “alone time”

 

from a thoughtful article

Games, consultants Tom DeMarco and Timothy Lister compared the work of more than 600 computer programmers at 92 companies. They found that people from the same companies performed at roughly the same level — but that there was an enormous performance gap between organizations. What distinguished programmers at the top-performing companies wasn’t greater experience or better pay. It was how much privacy, personal workspace and freedom from interruption they enjoyed. Sixty-two percent of the best performers said their workspace was sufficiently private compared with only 19 percent of the worst performers. Seventy-six percent of the worst programmers but only 38 percent of the best said that they were often interrupted needlessly.

Solitude can even help us learn. According to research on expert performance by the psychologist Anders Ericsson, the best way to master a field is to work on the task that’s most demanding for you personally. And often the best way to do this is alone. Only then, Mr. Ericsson told me, can you “go directly to the part that’s challenging to you. If you want to improve, you have to be the one who generates the move. Imagine a group class — you’re the one generating the move only a small percentage of the time.”

Conversely, brainstorming sessions are one of the worst possible ways to stimulate creativity. The brainchild of a charismatic advertising executive named Alex Osborn who believed that groups produced better ideas than individuals, workplace brainstorming sessions came into vogue in the 1950s. “The quantitative results of group brainstorming are beyond question,” Mr. Osborn wrote. “One group produced 45 suggestions for a home-appliance promotion, 56 ideas for a money-raising campaign, 124 ideas on how to sell more blankets.”

But decades of research show that individuals almost always perform better than groups in both quality and quantity, and group performance gets worse as group size increases. The “evidence from science suggests that business people must be insane to use brainstorming groups,” wrote the organizational psychologist Adrian Furnham. “If you have talented and motivated people, they should be encouraged to work alone when creativity or efficiency is the highest priority.”

Related articles

• First, Stop that Brainstorming? (laf.ee)
• The Power of Introverts: A Manifesto for Quiet Brilliance (scientificamerican.com)
• The Rise of the New Groupthink (leilavalence.wordpress.com)
• The Rise of the New Groupthink (nytimes.com)
• Jonah Lehrer: Brainstorming doesn’t really work. (newyorker.com)
• Need-To-Know: Generation Flux, Start-Up of You, Technology Heartbreak (the99percent.com)
• Need-To-Know: Generation Flux, The Start-Up of You, Technology Heartbreak (the99percent.com)
• The Power of Introverts: A Manifesto for Quiet Brilliance (livescience.com)
• Brainstorming is a bad idea (yet again)? (fyeomans.com)
• Why The New Yorker’s Claim That Brainstorming “Doesn’t Work” Is An Overstatement And Possibly Wrong (bobsutton.typepad.com)

Gingrich: an inch deep and a mile wide, his own anti-message

Image via Wikipedia

What a disaster for the Republicans Gingrich is.  having had 3 years to craft a message of hope, growth, opportunity and fiscal sanity, they have found themselves worshipping the mouth that roared.

Gingrich’s personal life evidences such a lack of discipline that it undermines the party’s claims of bringing sober, responsible, controlled limited government to Washington.  But the republicans have almost enver really stood for limited government except for a few brief shining years in the 80s. Their cozy relationship with multi-national corporations and large scale defense contractors, and their record of spending when in power  surely is convincing that their governing principle is more of the same but with the trough tilted in their direction.

Gingrich will make the campaign and election a personal thing, a battle fo 2 different cults of personality, and make it all about who holds the reins of power in a DC centric scheme of government. The Gingrich myth is for a return to small limited governemnt, but he is making it all about him and grand re-inventions.  That is the antithesis of small government.

Gingrich is tailor made for an outrage-a-day media which needs politicians to write their lead for them, and so Gingrich is their preferred candidate.

Romney’s story lines are so bland and convioluted, and require deep analysis that the press must surely dread the work that opposition reserarch on him would entail.  All they have to do to get good headlines is offer him a microphone, and their week is set.

After 3 years of opportunity to make the anti-Obama case, this is what the republicans have become: a bundle of one liners and dice rolls in the hands of  an ego maniac with little to no self restraint .

Related articles

• The South Carolina Primary (spwg22.wordpress.com)
• Anti-Intellectualism: The Gingrich Front (jonathanturley.org)
• Gingrich Sets His Sights On Florida (miami.cbslocal.com)
• GOP Race Is Now a Tossup (pjmedia.com)
• South Carolina Vote Was “Primal Scream”, Newt Gingrich “Not Sustainable” (dekerivers.wordpress.com)
• It was a knockout for Gingrich in SC. The party leadership can’t cover for Romney on this one. (iflizwerequeen.com)
• Scorned Woman Loses, Gingrich Convincingly Wins In South Carolina (mundabor.wordpress.com)
• Brace Yourselves for the War on Gingrich (markamerica.com)
• Newt Gingrich or Mitt Romney: Who Should it be America? (votingamerican.wordpress.com)
• Chris Christie Introduces the Establishment’s Fear of Gingrich In To the Presidential Race (whitehouse12.com)
• US – Gingrich beats Romney in South Carolina primaries (laaska.wordpress.com)
• Newtered (webnerhouse.com)
• Iowa polls: Gingrich strong but vulnerable (politico.com)
• Analysis: How Newt Gingrich Won South Carolina (boston.cbslocal.com)